Latest Posts

Thursday 6 June 2013

BABY MAN




There is a literal truthfulness to children that is not only refreshing but shows you how much we change as humans as we age. As adults we find ourselves evading the truth to spare other people’s feelings, opting for a fib to make our lives easier (unless you're in politics and then it's par for the course), and speaking in euphemisms and ambiguity for fear of retribution. It’s downright exhausting when you think about it.

But when it comes to children, they call it as they see it – some adults of course do this, and are labeled abrasive or socially dysfunctional, a very few walk away scot-free with a ‘refreshing’ moniker slapped on their forehead. The King at the moment is noticing those around him in a big way; the only problem is at the moment he's still confusing his pronouns and 'question words'. So he walks down the street, points at men and women and hollers, ‘What’s that?!’ Trust me, he gets more than a few looks and giggles when he does this.

The other day we were in a shop and there was a man working behind the till. There was another man in front of the till paying for his items who was a bit taller than the other man. The King sized them both up, after asking me ‘what’s that’ of course, and then shouted ‘Mama, there’s a man.’ Pointing at the man in front of the counter. He then pointed to the shorter of the two and said in his matter a fact way, ‘and there’s a baby man!’ Yes, these are the moments that embarrass the hell out of you and make you burst out laughing at the same time. And of course everyone has the parental story of their child saying something frighteningly frank and literal to members of the general public. Sometimes it’s met with smiles and adoring gazes, other times, not so much. In fact, I can remember when I was young declaring (loudly) that an overweight woman I saw in a store had a baby in her belly. She of course did not appreciate it as she was not pregnant.

And of course every time the King does say something in his blatantly literal way, I can’t help but think how far we’ve come from literal language when it comes to describing our fellow human beings (and still remaining socially acceptable of course). Don’t get me wrong; sometimes this is for a very good reason. We humans love labels and sometimes they can be brutal and cruel, and you wish that the descriptive adjective would be thrown out with the bathwater. But other times, you realize that we are fast becoming a society cloaked in a ball of euphemisms to hide what is blatantly obvious. Perhaps we have the advertising industry to blame for some of this. As the King sees it, at the moment hair is ‘big’ or ‘small.’ His aunt rocks the most incredible afro in the world and he has deemed it gloriously 'big.' Of course the advertising world has a litany of words to describe hair but big is not usually among them. They prefer sexy words like voluminous and glossy.

I suppose all this gets me thinking of the way in which we differentiate between a truth, a lie and an appropriate evasion, if you will. When you’re raising kids, you spend many years telling them they cannot tell a lie, and the truth is tantamount (and in the same breath you tell them Santa Claus exists). And then, when you find yourself wading through the above territory, you find yourself teaching them to embrace more ‘appropriate’ versions of the truth that are socially acceptable. ‘She’s not fat sweetheart, she’s full-bodied.’ [Then again, she wouldn’t be anything cause you’re certainly not supposed to label people by their size]. Then again, how do you teach your children to understand descriptions? I mean, who knows, the King might be a newspaper journalist (hahhhhaaaa as if print media will be around in twenty years!), he certainly would have to know his way around descriptively exact language.

So, you find yourself telling your kids what they can and can’t say and how to describe things in a million different ways that are socially acceptable, and yet, often not literal. So for now, short men are baby men. And why the hell not, sounds perfectly acceptable to me. 

Tuesday 4 June 2013

I DO, I DO, I DO AGAIN


[ONE FROM THE ARCHIVES TODAY AS I STILL HAVE MY HANDS FULL WITH THE POX LADENED CHILD. NEW BLOG TOMORROW!]

There is a new reality show about to hit the airwaves – cause that is just what we need, more reality television – about a polygamist, his three wives and their 300 kids. Okay fine, they don’t have 300 kids, but once you move into the double digits one is tempted to stop counting.

I believe the attempt of the show is to show to the rest of the world how normal a polygamist's life is; they love one another, do grocery shopping, take the kids to school, you know Brady Bunch type stuff…that is if Mr. Brady was married to Carol, Alice, and Greg’s high school math teacher. Now that would’ve been a sitcom worth watching. According to the husband it all happened innocently enough. He claims he just fell in love and fell in love and fell in love. From where I come from I think that’s called cheating. I'm sure the man in question would call it semantics.

The kicker is, the wives think it’s all fine and dandy and swear that jealousy is not something that occurs in their household. Uh huh. Okay...I’m just not sure how that is possible to not have any jealousy. Nuclear couples have jealousy, and you’re telling me that with that many people in a house, not to mention that many hormones, there is none?? How about just a little… "she stole my blouse? Or she got you on Tuesday night and I had to miss my favorite TV program;” Or, “My meatloaf is better than hers." Call me jaded, but I just don't buy that this is all just one big happy family.

Then again, perhaps if everyone signs up for the same adventure, they know what’s coming around every turn.  And in fact, the husband, or as I have deemed him, Mr. “I can’t Seem to Get Enough Tail” is bringing in a fourth wife and all the current wives are eagerly anticipating it like it’s a new Labrador puppy. Something tells me wife number four will be on toilet cleaning duty for the first year while the other wives put their feet up and eat bon bons.

What’s even better – for him of course – is that this man has his own little harem of women looking after him 24-7. Now there is your answer to why polygamy exists in a patriarchal society. Why have one when you can have four – a no brainer. The wives say they function as a well-oiled machine, a real team that has each other’s backs – [yeah, each one wondering where to drive the knife in]. Okay, in truth, the teamwork thing does not surprise me. My girlfriends/sisters and I often say to one another that we wish we could raise our children altogether as it would be a heck of a lot easier. No giving directions on what to do, maternal instinct just kicking in, each woman knowing what the other is thinking and being able to anticipate it far in advance– you know, the stuff men can’t do.

I also find it curious that it’s always men that take more than one wife (actually I think I know the answer to this). It’s so rare that you see women with three husbands. Then again, I’m thinking it is because they realize it would be more of a headache than a help. Three sets of boxer shorts to pick up, three dinners to cook, three men looking at you with that blank stare when you ask them if they have anything to say; three men to say to ‘not tonight honey, I have a headache!’ Three men looking for their house keys and mobile phone.

No thanks. I find one tiring enough (love ya honey). 


Copyright © 2014 Anthea Anka - Delighted And Disturbed